Chapter 14 Study Reading Guide the Spread of Chineses Ciivlizaton
See a Problem?
Thanks for telling u.s. about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Reader Q&A
Community Reviews
His collectivist, Marxist prejudices also render his explanation for China's economical and technological stagnation in the late 19th Century completely unconvincing. Although the 2d edition was published in 1996, he was still in the thrall of Maoist economical development. Thus he says,
"in turning in our mean solar day towards a collectivist, state economy nearer to its ancient traditions the Chinese world has remained faithful to its own genius. Similarly the adoption of parliamentary institutions modelled on those of the Western nations was to plough out afterward to be a nonsense, non because Cathay was not 'ripe' for liberal democracy, but because such borrowed institutions were profoundly alien to Chinese traditions."
To say thus is overly simplistic, and in fact it disrespects the genius and adaptability of the Chinese people (or any other people, for that matter). His description of China's decline at the finish of the 19th century focuses considerably on "humiliation" and confront. He seems to advise that their humiliation at the hands of arrogant Westerners prevented the Chinese from being capable of whatever energetic activity. This I don't believe -- the corruption that they suffered at the easily of the Mongols was far greater, and fifty-fifty the Ching takeover included devastating massacres that must have been dispiriting to many elements of society.
As well, his scornful dismissal of Chiang Kai-shek appears to be emotion-laden, simply as is his celebration of the Maoist "peasant" regular army. This description of what happened is completely contradicted past Chang and Halliday's account in "Mao, the Unknown Story". In particular, he offers a complete whitewash of the "100 Flowers Movement" and the "Nifty Leap Frontwards".
This lack of objectivity has its advantages and disadvantages. On the negative side, of course, you are getting a slanted presentation of history. On the positive, side, though, you are getting a point of view that rises to a higher place the all-as well-mutual dry out accounting of events without analysis.
The book uses the Wade-Giles arrangement of transliteration into Roman characters. The translation from the French is amazingly fluent and makes the book a good read. Still, the index is and so atrocious as to be absolutely worthless. It is a waste of time to look anything up in this alphabetize.
...more
Género. Historia.
Lo que nos cuenta. El libro El mundo chino (publicación original: Le monde chinois, 1972) es una aproximación a Mainland china desde la Edad de Bronce hasta el final del siglo 20, que cubre aspectos arqueológicos, sociológicos, políticos y puramente históricos.
¿Quiere saber más de este libro, sin spoilers? Visite:
http://librosdeolethros.blogspot.com/...
-Muy clarificador, muy global, muy jugoso, muy rígido.-Género. Historia.
Lo que nos cuenta. El libro El mundo chino (publicación original: Le monde chinois, 1972) es una aproximación a China desde la Edad de Bronce hasta el terminal del siglo 20, que cubre aspectos arqueológicos, sociológicos, políticos y puramente históricos.
¿Quiere saber más de este libro, sin spoilers? Visite:
http://librosdeolethros.blogspot.com/...
...more
Gernet presents a vast panorama of history which is hard at the all-time of times. He presents information technology with clarity and eruditio
I picked this volume up because I'yard teaching a Globe Civilizations course in the autumn and felt I needed to read a bit deeper into the history of China considering this will exist one of my go-to civilizations for the course. I was generally enlightened of the basic outlines of Chinese history, simply not really in much item considering most of my academic background is the Graeco-Roman world.Gernet presents a vast panorama of history which is difficult at the best of times. He presents information technology with clarity and erudition, so information technology holds together and is quite readable. Of course, with whatsoever scholarly survey, he but doesn't have the time and space (it is already over 600 pages long) to go into tremendous detail which is a claiming for a non-specialist like myself. My general familiarity with the broad outline of Chinese history helped, just I know there are details I missed because I only didn't sympathise it well enough. This is particularly true in intellectual history which is not my stiff point in this area. I accept a general sense now, but I don't think I sympathise Chinese philosophy, art or religion. Non actually, at whatever rate.
My sense of the general narrative is, at times, shaky. This is specially true in the aboriginal catamenia, which is the period I'm teaching on (along with the mediaeval). I'grand non sure I understand the primeval period of Chinese history except that it has the familiar blend of legend and textile evidence that 1 finds in the Graeco-Roman period earlier, say, 800 BCE. (or later equally some would fence, say 490 BCE). Again, non Gernet's fault, but sometimes information technology helps to tell the stories, even if they are likely legendary.
The tone, in general, is the standard detached bookish tone for much of the volume. It shifts as we reach the late 19th century to include much more outrage at the treatment of Mainland china by the Western powers and Japan from the 1850s on. The outrage is understandible, but Gernet loses his border of disengagement effectually here. His treatment of the Communist era is, of form, rather skimpy, just he is getting to the stop of a rather long work and, as he notes, information technology wasn't (and still isn't really) articulate what the historical significance of events of the 80s and 90s are probable to be.
Gernet'southward book is well worth the reading, even if it is getting a little long in the molar.
...more than
Far and away the most interesting menstruum for me was the 19th century. It is mindboggling how People's republic of china cruel from such a power to a third world country at the mercy of multiple foreign powers. And then many small
I knew I only knew a little about China's history, merely reading these books fabricated me realize I knew fifty-fifty less than I thought. I read the books in concert, alternating between them to cover the same time periods. Together they gave a broad view and reinforced what I was learning, one from the other.Far and away the most interesting menses for me was the 19th century. It is mindboggling how China fell from such a power to a third world country at the mercy of multiple foreign powers. Then many pocket-sized happenings and circumstances conspired to destroy all that Prc had going for it. It is fascinating to effort and empathize. It gave me a greater appreciation for the Industrial Revolution in the Western World. Only in seeing the upshot its absence had on China do I empathise the progress fabricated clearer.
Some other random things that caught my heed:
Since the Chinese alphabet is in symbols, non letters, dialects and sound changes don't matter. I can't read Sometime English considering the letters/sounds have changed too much. But Chinese tin read aboriginal text because changes in sounds have no result on significant. Even so, learning all the symbols is a very long process, and so throughout history information technology took more try to be literate.
Despite very dissimilar religions, religious beliefs worked confronting truth and noesis seekers as it did in the West. The beliefs limited change and pursuit of noesis.
Also, simply similar in the West, in that location were repeated calls in history to "render to former values." Buddhism was driven out every bit a foreign concept, as were Western ideas and innovations at various times.
China never had trademarks. This has to have had profound effects on the endeavour put into innovation.
Overall I was left wanting to know more about several things:
Ming Taizu (Hongwu Emperor) is someone I would similar to know more than almost.
For centuries Red china relied heavily on eunuchs every bit administrators. Why? What did they believe was unlike almost eunuchs that made them fit to govern?
Both books referred oftentimes to cults and "secret societies" throughout history. White Lotus Cult, Cult of the Ruby-red Hats, etc. These cults started civil wars, and were a near abiding source of unrest. But little was explained about them. How did they start? How did they role? How did people become involved in them? What about Chinese culture predicated their popularity for thousands of years?
I consider reading these books a keen success. I walk away feeling similar I understand China and then much improve. Mayhap next twelvemonth I volition tackle India.
...more
Die Geschichte Chinas, einen Zeitraum von 4000 Jahren, beschrieben in knapp 600 Seiten - das ist ein enormes, mutiges Unterfangen. Grundsätzlich finde ich dieses Werk sehr gelungen, habe aber so meine Probleme mit Universalgeschichten. And then richtig zum entspannten Lesen taugt der Band nicht wirklich, da sein Aufzählungscharakter dafür zu hinderlich ist, es kommt kein richtiger Lesefluss auf, besonders, da unterschiedliche Ebenen (wie dice wirtschaftliche, geistige und politische) g
6 Jahre pro SeiteDie Geschichte Chinas, einen Zeitraum von 4000 Jahren, beschrieben in knapp 600 Seiten - das ist ein enormes, mutiges Unterfangen. Grundsätzlich finde ich dieses Werk sehr gelungen, habe aber then meine Probleme mit Universalgeschichten. And so richtig zum entspannten Lesen taugt der Band nicht wirklich, da sein Aufzählungscharakter dafür zu hinderlich ist, es kommt kein richtiger Lesefluss auf, besonders, da unterschiedliche Ebenen (wie dice wirtschaftliche, geistige und politische) getrennt voneinander abgehandelt werden - andererseits ist er als Nachschlagewerk für spezielle Fragestellungen dann aber zu unfokussiert.
Einzelne Bereiche, wie die Kapitel über dice vorgeschichtliche Zeit Chinas, sind mühsam zu lesen - andere Bereiche, wie die Kapitel über die ausgehende Qing-Dynastie und den Taiping-Aufstand lesen sich dagegen wie ein Krimi und faszinieren extrem. Das Problem besteht bei diesem Buch natürlich auch in der Entstehungszeit - man kann nicht wirklich heutzutage ein Buch von 1972 bedingungslos empfehlen. Erstens fehlen dadurch alle Post-Mao-Themen, und auch die Analyse der Ereignisse gerade des 20.Jh. bis dahin sind doch vom Zeitgeist beeinflusst und nur sehr rudimentär in oberflächlichster Form abgehandelt. Zweitens gibt es gerade im geschichtlichen Bereich neue Ansätze und Forschungsergebnisse in diesen 40 vergangenen Jahren, die and so unter den Tisch fallen. Wer also sich mehr für das "neue" China nach 1911 interessiert oder wirklich auf dem aktuellen Forschungsstand sein möchte, sollte die Lektüre mit aktuellen Werken unterfüttern. Für einen allgemeinen Überblick über Chinas Geschichte allerdings ist dieses Werk durchaus gelungen, wenn für Laien aber vielleicht etwas umfangreich und detailliert.
Sehr umfangreiche Indizes und ausführlichste Zeittabellen komplettieren das Werk. Der dicke Wälzer ist dicht bedruckt und enthält immer wieder Illustrationen, Karten und Fotografien von Kunstwerken - diese alle sind im typischen Time-Life-Stil und wirken heutzutage etwas altbacken.
...more
It is a given that roofing such a large bridge of fourth dimension in a single book that is not even a k pages long will necessarily gloss over many important events and the volume will be defective in one are or some other, but Jacques Gerrnet makes a skillful plenty synthesis of near of China's history and the book tin be read comfortably most of the time.
The volume is at information technology'south worst w This is a full general hisotry of Prc, from the offset dynasties of the Bronze Age all the way to the second half of the XXth century.
It is a given that roofing such a large bridge of time in a single volume that is not even a 1000 pages long will necessarily gloss over many important events and the book will be lacking in one are or another, just Jacques Gerrnet makes a skilful enough synthesis of most of China'southward history and the volume tin can be read comfortably most of the time.
The book is at it's worst when reaching the end of XIXth century and is especailly outrageous when dealing with Mao'southward reforms.
He describes the backyard furnaces fiasco as "an appeal to the inventive genious and traditional techniques", the Hundred Flowers Campaing as "a reform attempt getting out of hand" and the sparrow killings equally "fighting the pests destroying the crops".
But because it was written last century by a French sinologist, his Maoism shouldn't come as a surprise.
His perspective is systematic and with a clear focus on the material conditions, which is probably the just good way to write a general history, but I found the last chapter of each section of the book, the ones that talk about the cultural history (mainly literature and philosophy) to be the most interesting.
Overall this is a good introductory book to Chinese history and getting a general overview, fifty-fifty if it can come off as too dry at times. Just skip everything from the 1850s forward.
...more
Exhaustive (and a little exhausting)--assorted politics/war/economics with culture in dissever chapters. I couldn't decide if this was an interesting perspective or a distraction. Perhaps it would take been clearer in ii separate books.
My effect with it only surfaced when I (finally!) reached 20th century Chinese history. Because I actually knew something about that, I started to realise how much was being skipped over (less than a
Articulate prose with elements of humor to make it easier to read.Exhaustive (and a little exhausting)--contrasted politics/war/economics with culture in dissever chapters. I couldn't decide if this was an interesting perspective or a distraction. Mayhap it would accept been clearer in ii separate books.
My issue with it just surfaced when I (finally!) reached 20th century Chinese history. Because I actually knew something virtually that, I started to realise how much was being skipped over (less than a page on the Civil State of war, virtually the same on the Great Jump Forward!).
Since detail is clearly not its matter, does it serve as a expert introduction? Well, so I become overwhelmed with the cultural history chapters. Peradventure it didn't help that I picked up, in a second hand store, a massive Folio version of the text, which spanned 2 volumes and, because it was big and heavy, was a literal physical attempt to read. (Upon reflection, its 750 pages should not take taken three and a half years to read, and that subsequently a number of imitation starts). What can I say? Information technology'south not low-cal reading, and I was ill for a while.
I was spurred to attempt this run-through by buying a 'History of Modern Communist china' that is now yellowing with age (published in 2008). That should 'fill in the gaps' of this volume on mod Chinese history. Even then, so much has happened that is crucial in understanding world history since 2008--is it fifty-fifty possible to read history books like that?
...more than
For my purposes, it provided such a detailed look at the trees, I got completely lost in the forest, and one-time forgot I was in a forest -
In my ongoing quest to gain a full general knowledge of China and its history I trudged my mode through this exhaustively, comprehensive and scholastic tome. I'yard certain the terminal sentence seems a criticism, when, in fact, I intend it as, well, a statement of fact. I constitute information technology full of them. Enough that I imagine that it would serve well as a graduate program text book.For my purposes, it provided such a detailed wait at the trees, I got completely lost in the forest, and sometime forgot I was in a forest - the very thing I was looking for. It is clearly a book that is designed for those who already are conversant with the names and concepts of all of the times and places and peoples of People's republic of china, without explaining what they refer to. This was hard for me to get my mind around.
Thus, its a good scholastic work - but non for the uninitiated or faint of heart.
...more than
so far...(ch one-iii)
throws a LOT of facts at yous & the translators are guilty of mass verbiage (every damn judgement). never the less...interesting
Notes of use:
Author uses wade-Giles (get out your converter)
Information technology is best to understand the basic structure of ancient china prior to reading, not the layman construction of what is meant by "Chinese"
It gets easier to read as you move along, specially keeping in mind the above.
so far...(ch 1-three)
throws a LOT of facts at you & the translators are guilty of mass verbiage (every damn sentence). never the less...interesting
Notes of utilize:
Author uses wade-Giles (get out your converter)
It is best to sympathise the bones construction of ancient china prior to reading, non the layman construction of what is meant by "Chinese"
It gets easier to read as yous move forth, especially keeping in mind the above.
...more
It is non, however, a good read - too dry and condensed.
Treat it like a detailed encyclopaedia; if you desire an informative but smooth read, try Jonathan Spence's books.
This is an excellent reference volume providing in-depth analysis and linkage between Chinese history and culture.It is not, however, a good read - besides dry out and condensed.
Treat it like a detailed encyclopaedia; if you lot want an informative but smooth read, endeavor Jonathan Spence's books.
...more than
How can i read this book?
Related Manufactures
Welcome dorsum. Simply a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
fontainepottirldind.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/571867.A_History_of_Chinese_Civilization
0 Response to "Chapter 14 Study Reading Guide the Spread of Chineses Ciivlizaton"
Post a Comment